Wikipedia
criticized that as you paideía enkýklios and she's not sure that the power of mistakes in it you will find that it is better to get away from it for the traditionally printed. Yes it is true that err is human, so what a man does, and can be a mistake. So you and here they were inevitable. However, I think it really krytykantom guided by completely different purpose. What kind of leave in the field of speculations. This is such a treasure trove of where today's Internet.
What happened was it? The answer to the criticism was Wikipedy Citizendium. in detail discussed in the article Catherine Dankiewicz . Such an Internet encyclopedia, except that done by professionals.
Wikipedia Firmly certain position, began to be quoted and cited in the text did not raise anyone's surprise. Now is time to Citizendium, which certainly, at least in the early years will be approached with suspicion.
In fact, it's still breathed a sigh of relief because finally you can use, in view of the great sources of information from the Internet via the monitor and cite and not be derailed.
